- From: Sebastian Zartner via GitHub <noreply@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2025 12:57:47 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Updated info and stats for typographic pseudo-elements, `font-tech()` and `font-format()`, `:is()`, `:where()`, `:has()`, and selector lists in `:not()`, and `conic-gradient()` and `<color-interpolation-method>`. @svgeesus: > For CSS Images 4: > > > * [WPT](https://wpt.fyi/results/css/css-images?label=master&label=stable&aligned&q=gradient): passing tests: Chrome: 2518, Edge: 2518, Firefox: 2897, Safari: 2857; [interop](https://wpt.fyi/results/css/css-images?label=master&label=stable&aligned&q=gradient+and+all(status%3Apass)): 2511 / 2907 (86.4%) > > Currently Chrome 2953 | Firefox 3335 | Safari 3249 | Edge 2963 > > Now [100% interop](https://wpt.fyi/results/css/css-images?label=stable&label=master&aligned&q=gradient%20and%20all%28status%3Apass%29) (2559 / 2559) on those gradient tests. The interop statistics are always 100%, as that's only showing the tests that pass in all browsers. The actual interop value is the number of tests that pass in all browsers devided by the total amount of tests, which is 2435 / 2948 (82.6%) in case of the tests related to conic gradients and the interpolation methods. Though note that the actual value might be a little different, as it is pretty hard to restrict the tests to a specific feature in the WPT search. Sebastian -- GitHub Notification of comment by SebastianZ Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/10687#issuecomment-3274873485 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Wednesday, 10 September 2025 12:57:48 UTC