- From: Guillaume via GitHub <noreply@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2025 09:12:42 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
cdoublev has just submitted a new pull request for https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts: == [css-borders-4][editorial] Rewrite syntaxes with property value range productions == It might not be obvious why property value range productions should be preferred (imo), so taking `corner-*` shorthands as an example, its current syntax is: > `<length-percentage [0,∞]>{1,2} || <corner-shape-value>`. When replaced with `<'border-top-left-radius'> || <'corner-top-left-shape'>`: - readers know *immediately* that the first value is a radius (and the second is a shape) - spec authors will not need to update it if the syntax of `corner-*-shape` is later updated to eg. `<corner-shape-value> | none` - implementers do not need to look up what the second `<length-percentage>` value should be when omitted - implementers may have to write less code to validate a grammar rule applying on the longhand value, to expand the shorthand value, and serialize a value according to the shortest value principle Applying this change left the extended definition of `<corner-shape-value>` at an inappropriate place, below the definition table of `corner-shape`, while it was no longer used in its syntax. So I took changes a little further and ended with moving/rewriting corner shaping sections to make all *Corners" sections more consistent, in a separate commit. I also made an unrelated editorial change. Although experienced CSS authors might intuitevily guess this, I suggest to explicitly defining that `corner-shape` values are expanded clockwise starting from the top corner, and what their default values when omitted. I preferred to suggest this change in a single PR to avoid merge conflicts. See https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/pull/12736 -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Friday, 5 September 2025 09:12:43 UTC