- From: Chris Rebert via GitHub <noreply@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2025 21:17:53 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
cvrebert has just submitted a new pull request for https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts: == [css-inline-3][editorial] Hyperlink instance of "in-flow" jargon == This hyperlinks another instance of the term "in-flow" to its formal definition for clarity. I note that this spec is already inconsistent in whether it uses the `<a>term</a>` vs. `[=term=]` Bikeshed linking syntax, including for `in-flow` specifically. Here, I've opted for the anchor syntax, for consistency with the surrounding paragraph. See https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/pull/13033 -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Tuesday, 28 October 2025 21:17:53 UTC