- From: Brian Kardell via GitHub <noreply@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2025 14:04:28 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
I'm really not sure this should have been merged, there are definitely some disagreements. This would make 2 otherwise interoperable implementations incorrect on quoted names, right? And @nt1m is making a case on one of the linked issues that it doesn't make sense. Also, minor nit but > hence parsed as invalid if is one of doesn't this miss the work "it"? -- GitHub Notification of comment by bkardell Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/pull/12985#issuecomment-3426857042 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Tuesday, 21 October 2025 14:04:29 UTC