- From: Sebastian Zartner via GitHub <noreply@w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2025 22:44:19 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
SebastianZ has just created a new issue for https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts: == Centralize definition for name conflict handling of naming at-rules == As @cdoublev pointed out in #12973, most of the at-rules that define a name have a definition that indicates that the last one wins. Though there are currently a few at-rules like [`@color-profile`](https://drafts.csswg.org/css-color-5/#at-profile) and [`@font-palette-values`](https://drafts.csswg.org/css-fonts-4/#font-palette-values), for which handling of duplicate names is undefined. Therefore, I think we should establish a general term for these name-defining at-rules and centralize the definition for name conflict handling, so all those rules can refer to it. I am not sure _where_ that definition could live. We currently have one for [at-rules](https://drafts.csswg.org/css-syntax-3/#at-rule) in general in CSS Syntax 3, but that might not be the best place for a definition like that. Sebastian Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/12977 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Saturday, 18 October 2025 22:44:20 UTC