- From: fantasai via GitHub <noreply@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2025 20:40:55 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
fantasai has just created a new issue for https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts: == [css-align-3][css-anchor-position-1] Do we want to allow `safe` or `unsafe` keywords by themselves / in combination with `normal`? == The Anchor Positioning spec introduces some automatic behavior for `normal` alignment in response to `position-area`. It defaults items to "smart" overflow alignment, trying to stay within the containing block. For any individual alignment value, the overflow alignment type can be overridden with `safe` or `unsafe`, but we don't currently have a way to tweak the automatic alignment to control its overflow safety without specifying an explicit alignment. Should we add a syntax for this? If so, would adding just an overflow alignment keyword by itself be sufficient? Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/12920 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Wednesday, 8 October 2025 20:40:56 UTC