- From: Sebastian Zartner via GitHub <noreply@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 06 Oct 2025 11:40:39 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
I'm still not convinced that we really have to use the term "grid" for this, even when it shares concepts with Grid Layout, but here we are. From the named suggestions _with_ "grid" in their name, I prefer `masonry-grid`, `packed-grid`, `stacked-grid`, `compact-grid`, and `flex-grid`. For what it's worth, I also [asked ChatGPT to come up with names](https://chatgpt.com/share/68e3a976-b088-8011-94f5-55b4a02011de). Interestingly, it first responded that CSS already has the concept of "Masonry Layout". When I asked it to ignore that there's already a term coined for it, its response was pretty similar to what was already suggested earlier. For reference, the terms it came up with were `packed-grid`, `flow-grid`, `compact-grid`, `autostack`, `dense-grid`, `cascade`, `brick-grid`, `column-flow`, `stackflow`, and `tiled-flow`. Sebastian -- GitHub Notification of comment by SebastianZ Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/12022#issuecomment-3371210361 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Monday, 6 October 2025 11:40:40 UTC