- From: Florian Rivoal via GitHub <noreply@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2025 08:45:51 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
I'm ok with the addition of the Level on every spec. As for the word "Module", it works in most cases, but there are a few where I'm not sure: * Media Queries & Selectors: while the primary application of these specs is CSS, they are usable in other contexts as well. Is it "you can used Media Queries with CSS as well as with `Window.matchMedia()`, or is it "You can also use the CSS ’Media Queries’ Module with `Window.matchMedia()`"? Same with Selectors. I've mostly tought of it so far in the first way, though we could make it work the second way too I suppose. * cssom-view : I can't quite put a finger on what's wrong, but adding the word module feels strange. Then again, the name of that spec in general feels pretty strange to me, so ¯\\\_(ツ)\_/¯ -- GitHub Notification of comment by frivoal Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/pull/12879#issuecomment-3355345401 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Wednesday, 1 October 2025 08:45:52 UTC