- From: Steve Kobes (Chromium) via GitHub <noreply@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2025 18:24:16 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
@flackr confirms via chat that despite the apparent wording in the resolution, it was NOT actually the WG's intent for the VT pseudo to be "painted... before... filters" i.e. for the VT pseudo to be affected by filter effects declared on the scope. So it acts like a sibling for clips, effects, and scrolling, but not transform. It is not obvious to me that "layout tree child with magical sibling-like properties" was a cleaner solution than "anchor-positioned sibling with magical ancestor-clipping", but I guess it is good that one way or another we are going to have our cake and eat it too. -- GitHub Notification of comment by skobes-chromium Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/12324#issuecomment-3554084075 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Wednesday, 19 November 2025 18:24:16 UTC