- From: CSS Meeting Bot via GitHub <noreply@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2025 03:24:48 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
The CSS Working Group just discussed ``[css-multicol-2] `column-wrap`, `column-height` and column balancing``, and agreed to the following: * `RESOLVED: go with option B (balancing still works)` <details><summary>The full IRC log of that discussion</summary> <rachelandrew> https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/11976#issuecomment-3227424707<br> <TabAtkins> rachelandrew: this is about this particular comment, not rest of issue thread<br> <TabAtkins> rachelandrew: we resolved, if there's not enough content to fill a column-height, you'll still get the specified height<br> <TabAtkins> rachelandrew: Morten points out that this can disable column balancing, if you've got all the height you can put all content in the first column<br> <TabAtkins> rachelandrew: think this isnt' what we want<br> <TabAtkins> rachelandrew: but it would mimic what happens in normal Multicol; if you've got more space you can still balance<br> <TabAtkins> florian: did you suggest that the row stretches to fill the space but the line wouldn't?<br> <TabAtkins> rachelandrew: we've got the columns themselves, then the content inside. if you stretch both it disables balancing effectively<br> <TabAtkins> rachelandrew: we dont' want that<br> <TabAtkins> rachelandrew: I think what we want here is MOrten's Option B<br> <astearns> ack fantasai<br> <TabAtkins> fantasai: if you run out of space before a spanner... never mind<br> <TabAtkins> astearns: objection to going with option b?<br> <TabAtkins> florian: there's lots of details in the issue, it's subtle. *if we assume* that what's discussed here in the room is sufficient, then I agree with B.<br> <TabAtkins> astearns: If there's re implications we missed, Morten will bring them up<br> <TabAtkins> RESOLVED: go with option B (balancing still works)<br> </details> -- GitHub Notification of comment by css-meeting-bot Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/11976#issuecomment-3530659488 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Friday, 14 November 2025 03:24:48 UTC