- From: Tab Atkins Jr. via GitHub <noreply@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2025 01:26:06 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
"Non-implicit default anchor" is not what we want to tie to; the implicit anchor is perfectly reasonable to refer to and is not meaningfully different from using a named anchor. But keying it off of a *non-`auto` default anchor* (with us re-adding the `implicit` keyword to let you specify the implicit anchor without relying on the `auto` keyword) would work. (We still need to add some keywords for this anyway; I want to have a keyword for every possible implicit anchor source. I don't *think* it's possible for the current implicit anchor sources to overlap on a single element, but I'm certain we will have that in the future.) -- GitHub Notification of comment by tabatkins Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/13067#issuecomment-3524686927 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Thursday, 13 November 2025 01:26:06 UTC