- From: Daniel Holbert via GitHub <noreply@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2025 22:19:26 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/7762#issuecomment-3510548776: > There are already a test [1] checking that an empty string is invalid for "animation-name". > > https://github.com/web-platform-tests/wpt/blob/master/css/css-animations/parsing/animation-name-invalid.html > > Do you think we still need ref tests for this case ? (Answering this^ question: we probably do need a more-thorough test of some sort (whether a reftest or a computed-style test), since per my comments above, `animation-name-invalid.html` only checks that the empty string **produces an empty specified-style serialization**. But in fact all browsers treat it as parseable and as having an effect on the computed style; but Chrome/Safari just serialize it as the empty string in `elem.style`.) -- GitHub Notification of comment by dholbert Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/7762#issuecomment-3524147454 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Wednesday, 12 November 2025 22:19:27 UTC