- From: Kevin Babbitt via GitHub <noreply@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2025 05:45:52 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
We chatted about the above case today. The varying gap sizes are definitely an issue for determining percentage basis, but the only case where having percentage basis resolve against crossing gap width is achieving 'join' behavior. In an earlier draft of Gap Decorations, I had a `join` keyword for that purpose. If we reintroduced that and made it magic so that it knows how to join decorations in the above case as well as for T intersections in Grid, that would remove the need to have percentages based on crossing gap width, which would remove the ambiguity that arises from differing gap widths. This is kind of intertwined with the changes we're discussing in #12784, so I think I'd like to bake these ideas some more before resolving on this issue. -- GitHub Notification of comment by kbabbitt Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/12922#issuecomment-3515094269 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Tuesday, 11 November 2025 05:45:54 UTC