- From: andruud via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 28 May 2025 10:05:51 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
@cdoublev Thanks for the review, as always. I'll address each point as needed, but first: I thought there was a distinction between CSSOM APIs that _serialize_ a value (produce valid CSS, e.g. cssText) and those that provide a "JS view" into the underlying data structure. - We don't _need_ to CSS-escape a CSSFunctionRule.name, because a JS string already knows where it begins, where it ends, and what its contents are. - Similarly, we don't need to wrap a syntax in "type()" if a (JS) string is known to _only_ hold a syntax. @cdoublev Perhaps you know about some guidelines (or even normative text) that proves my "world view" wrong here? -- GitHub Notification of comment by andruud Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/11908#issuecomment-2915741368 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Wednesday, 28 May 2025 10:05:51 UTC