- From: Noam Rosenthal via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 27 May 2025 15:56:19 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
I see the #9843 as more related to stroke, like "stroking the border with round joins" rather than something that's connected with `border-radius`. I think that with squircles and similar round-ish shapes (which is one of the major use cases for this) falling back to rounded corners makes a lot more sense than falling back to having zero radius. I think we can do the following: - `border-radius` effectively a shorthand (of sorts, given that it's already a shorthand for the different corners) for `corner-size: $radius; corner-shape: round;` - We separately think of rounding the strokes, which is a separate thing than border-radius (for example, it doesn't affect the inner clipping etc) I am not sure if this is very necessary but definitely possible if it makes things more readable for designers. In either case, this lets us add `corner-size` later as a readability enhancement. -- GitHub Notification of comment by noamr Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/11623#issuecomment-2913111546 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Tuesday, 27 May 2025 15:56:20 UTC