- From: jsnkuhn via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 27 May 2025 12:05:38 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
I can try and clarify what I'm asking a bit: Important point is that there would be no cross over between `border-radius` and the `corner-` properties. `border-radius` would continue doing what it does unless `corner-shape` _and_ `corner-size` are declared as something other than `none` i guess? In that case the `corner-` properties would take over and `border-radius` would do nothing. (this leaves open the opportunity for the future for border-radius to round the joints of the `corner-shapes`. (side note: I was told that this would be too complicated to do - too many control points - but that has been said about a lot of things in CSS in the past that have ultimately happened so it seems best to leave this open as a possibility.) `border-radius` could then be used as a fallback for the `corner-` pair if one or the other of the `corner-` properties is not declared. This would also allow the use of different `border-radius` values for the fallback. I don't think this would be a common need but seems like it might be useful with larger `squircle` shapes: > corner-shape: squircle; > corner-size: 50px; > border-radius: 99999px; -- GitHub Notification of comment by jsnkuhn Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/11623#issuecomment-2912263258 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Tuesday, 27 May 2025 12:05:39 UTC