- From: Bramus via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 14 May 2025 08:49:12 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
+1 on not using a non-zero lose-interest delay for reasons outlined by @tabatkins [above](https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/9236#issuecomment-2855465696). The initial values should be keywords indeed (`normal`?) > ([#](https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/9236#issuecomment-2877997194)) I still think the lose-interest delay default should be quite fast. Doing some testing, `0.05s` _feels_ the best. I wouldn't go slower than `0.1s` for the default values. In https://codepen.io/bramus/pen/raNLLor I landed on these values when hovering with the mouse: ```css interest-target-show-delay: 0.25s; interest-target-hide-delay: 0.10s; ``` What I also found was that I wanted much much shorter delays when tabbing into the element _(versus hovering it)_ but that is food for a follow-up issue. -- GitHub Notification of comment by bramus Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/9236#issuecomment-2879357445 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Wednesday, 14 May 2025 08:49:13 UTC