- From: Andreu Botella via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 13 May 2025 22:54:33 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
> [@andreubotella](https://github.com/andreubotella) [@andruud](https://github.com/andruud) Is that a significant risk for this property in particular, or just generally a concern to think about? I don't think the risk is significantly higher than for other properties that have been implemented as longhands for a long time, and in fact it might be lower because of the fact that it's vendor-prefixed. So it's more about the general concern. Something that should also be part of the discussion, though, is that unprefixed `line-clamp` should be implemented as a shorthand (since the plan is to eventually expose some longhands for it, whether it's the ones currently described in the spec or not), but currently there are no longhands that it `line-clamp` would be short for. To what extent is that an issue? -- GitHub Notification of comment by andreubotella Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/10439#issuecomment-2878135628 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Tuesday, 13 May 2025 22:54:34 UTC