- From: Bramus via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 13 May 2025 09:04:06 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
> Having the `::view-transition-nested-groups` be sized to the content box does seem painful for devs, where they'd have to recreate a bunch of sizing stuff. I believe you mean sized to the _border box_ here ;) This is effectively the tree from example 4 from [the playground](https://codepen.io/bramus/full/EaxvMXG/11b9fcbe8ebf42034110d3b486db037f) but with the CSS fixups from example 3 applied. > The idea [@bramus](https://github.com/bramus) attributed to [@flackr](https://github.com/flackr) seemed great to me, where the `::view-transition-nested-groups` where the border size of the parent is captured, and assigned as a transparent border to the `::view-transition-nested-groups`. I know there were complexities around the layered capture, but do we hit them in this simple case? For reference, this is example 5 from [the playground](https://codepen.io/bramus/full/EaxvMXG/11b9fcbe8ebf42034110d3b486db037f). For demonstration purposes I am using a `dashed lime` border – instead of a `transparent` one – on the `::view-transition-nested-groups` so that you can see what is going on. -- GitHub Notification of comment by bramus Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/11926#issuecomment-2875639696 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Tuesday, 13 May 2025 09:04:07 UTC