Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-borders-4] Consider constraining radii for concave corner-shape when opposite corners overlap (#12098)

Agree that constraining the radii makes more sense than changing the shape. But how exactly does the constraining work? Does the superellipse value affect the amount of constraining? If one corner is `notch`, and the opposite corner is `scoop`, are they constrained equally? Do we constrain just enough such that the inner edge of the border touches (i.e. you never end up with two disjoint shapes as seen above)?

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by smfr
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/12098#issuecomment-2858953761 using your GitHub account


-- 
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config

Received on Wednesday, 7 May 2025 15:03:30 UTC