- From: Noam Rosenthal via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 06 May 2025 19:15:24 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
> When we're shrinking adjacent corners, we purposely shrink both radiuses, to keep the corner "shaped" the same. We also shrink both corners the same amount, just because there's no way to know which we should bias towards. I think we should do the same here. > > That is, I think option 1 is the only reasonable option. Changing the superellipse parameter, or changing only _one_ radius, both change the corner shape in dramatic ways, and I don't think either of those are acceptable outcomes. I am fine with this but would like to hear from others (@smfr / @SebastianZ / @LeaVerou / @fantasai ?). If we get a rough consensus I'm happy to async resolve, or Agenda+ if we don't. -- GitHub Notification of comment by noamr Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/12098#issuecomment-2855651331 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Tuesday, 6 May 2025 19:15:25 UTC