- From: Tab Atkins Jr. via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 02 May 2025 21:30:18 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Yeah, these naming patterns aren't quite consistent with what we use elsewhere. What about: * `:interest-invoker` (matching any interest) and `:interest-invoker(partial | total)`? (`total` keyword just a guess) * `:interest-target` and `:interest-target(partial | total)`, same meanings Do we want to expose a state keyword for things that are *potentially* interest invokers/targets, but that are currently without any interest? Or is that ambiguous when interest isn't being shown? -- GitHub Notification of comment by tabatkins Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/12154#issuecomment-2848152870 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Friday, 2 May 2025 21:30:18 UTC