- From: gitspeaks via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2025 23:03:29 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
I'm not ignoring anything. The condition "any item that has a flex factor of zero" is a blanket rule that ends up breaking most layouts. I genuinely don’t understand how you’re not seeing this, especially considering the example above where everything *freezes* at that point — **regardless** of whether it's in the “otherwise, use the flex shrink factor” case. > Without using a term that you invented without defining I didn’t invent any term. When items shrink, it *implies* a direction of flexing. Either way, I was very clear in my proposal: > * If using the flex grow factor: freeze any item whose flex base size is greater than its hypothetical main size, or whose `flex-grow` value is `0`. > * If using the flex shrink factor: freeze any item whose flex base size is smaller than its hypothetical main size, or whose `flex-shrink` value is `0`. -- GitHub Notification of comment by gitspeaks Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/12021#issuecomment-2762793117 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Friday, 28 March 2025 23:03:30 UTC