- From: gitspeaks via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2025 22:14:50 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
>if now it's good. (one of the cases, at least)
I argue now it's practically bad in the majority of cases.
Example:
```html
<div style="display: flex; width: 500px; font-family: Arial; outline: red solid;">
<div>
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit. Itaque, vitae? Recusandae porro eveniet sapiente placeat magnam enim fugit provident, numquam vero ducimus minus iusto ullam aliquam. Labore, optio? Recusandae nesciunt voluptatem reiciendis deserunt voluptates quod nostrum aperiam ad eius similique explicabo quasi placeat aliquam cumque laboriosam qui animi hic voluptatum, iusto nemo molestiae possimus deleniti dolorum! Quae laboriosam ratione deleniti corporis facere temporibus adipisci, illo doloribus? Maxime sed dicta soluta animi nesciunt saepe eum. Excepturi nam enim numquam ipsam placeat praesentium, optio eligendi natus odit quo sunt nobis quisquam tempora molestias explicabo eveniet est nulla magnam maxime! Optio, maiores temporibus.
</div>
<img src="box.jpg" alt="box" style="width: 50%;" />
</div>
```
Both items have flex-grow: 0, so they fall under the condition: “any item that has a flex factor of zero,” which means they should be frozen.
Obviously, that’s not what happens—and not what’s expected either.
--
GitHub Notification of comment by gitspeaks
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/12021#issuecomment-2762698157 using your GitHub account
--
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Friday, 28 March 2025 22:14:51 UTC