- From: Oriol Brufau via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2025 21:18:34 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
> we should give oriol a chance to comment on here So after a week I'm getting more used to the new proposal. Not opposed, but still a bit concerned it may the a source of confusion if authors assume that `random(--foo, 0, 1)` will be like `list-style-type: --foo` or `animation-name: --foo` where different elements referencing the same ident get the same behavior. -- GitHub Notification of comment by Loirooriol Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/11742#issuecomment-2738141684 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Wednesday, 19 March 2025 21:18:35 UTC