- From: Mayank via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2025 00:49:06 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
For anyone else following this issue, there has been some activity in https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/1055. I would recommend reading at least these four comments: 1. @alice's original concern above: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/10711#issuecomment-2359573310 2. @scottaohara's list of valid use-cases above: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/10711#issuecomment-2379610168 3. @alice's top-layer idea potentially addressing those use-cases: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/pull/11178#discussion_r1845716939 4. @matatk's comment on the TAG review: https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/1055#issuecomment-2725956455 - Most recent APA minutes: https://www.w3.org/2025/03/12-apa-minutes.html#5307 Also, I was surprised to see that `interactivity` is intended to ship in [Chrome 135](https://developer.chrome.com/blog/chrome-135-beta#css_inertness). Given all the pending discussions, I think it should be delayed. -- GitHub Notification of comment by mayank99 Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/10711#issuecomment-2726071921 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Saturday, 15 March 2025 00:49:07 UTC