- From: Guillaume via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2025 08:55:40 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
> I'm concerned about readability.
Agreed. The list for [`<family-name>`](https://drafts.csswg.org/css-fonts-4/#family-name-syntax) would be very long.
On one hand, there are not that many contexts with reserved keywords. That said, assuming implementations that would rely on this data rely on `w3c/webref`, Bikeshed could help:
```html
<dfn excludes="none, foo, bar"><<something-foo>></dfn>
```
Exported by `w3c/webref` as:
```json
{
"name": "<something-foo>",
"type": "type",
"excludes": "none, foo, bar",
}
```
On the other hand, authors should also be considered since they can specify a value definition syntax in `@property/initial-value`, `@function`, `if()`, etc. This syntax is restricted but they might find it usefull to exclude some keywords for `<custom-ident>`.
--
GitHub Notification of comment by cdoublev
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/11924#issuecomment-2720470312 using your GitHub account
--
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Thursday, 13 March 2025 08:55:41 UTC