- From: Mason Freed via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2025 15:39:56 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
> Sorry to be really specific here, did chrome try with that alias and Google ultimately had a different risk appetite to Microsoft? Or did Google not try to use that. If we can have that as a compat alias and it solve the issue that feels like a great way to go. No, Chrome has a policy of not shipping vendor prefixes, so it was `::reveal` or nothing. And due to compat (and general risk reduction to be able to ship the rest of the project), we went with nothing. I'm still very supportive of a `::reveal` pseudo, as long as we can do it compatibly. -- GitHub Notification of comment by mfreed7 Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/11845#issuecomment-2714810497 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Tuesday, 11 March 2025 15:39:57 UTC