Re: [csswg-drafts] [meta] How should we indicate which features in a pre-CR draft are “stable enough” to reference? (#11863)

I agree with Tab’s comment re: cross-WG bureaucracy.

I think it’s OK for other groups to link to pre-CR CSSWG drafts, as long as they are OK taking on the risk that things may change and require updates. I also think it’s OK for other groups to ask whether something is actually farther along than the draft status might indicate. In this case I think our answer would likely be “no, not yet.”

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by astearns
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/11863#issuecomment-2711959390 using your GitHub account


-- 
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config

Received on Monday, 10 March 2025 22:09:44 UTC