- From: Alan Stearns via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2025 20:27:11 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
So my next question is whether our “safe to release” state is what WHATWG needs to land https://github.com/whatwg/html/pull/10956 @domenic appears to be saying it’s not required. @annevk appears to be saying it is (or at least *some* signal of stability is needed) I’m not sure `interactivity` is ready to be marked "safe to release” anyway, as the TAG is currently working on their [review](https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/1055#issuecomment-2695910757), and I see from the [intent thread](https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/O5ZmbyRh9LE/m/cqwaZmbaAQAJ) that it’s been shipped with promises to “invest in additional changes as necessary” -- GitHub Notification of comment by astearns Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/11863#issuecomment-2711745066 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Monday, 10 March 2025 20:27:12 UTC