- From: Tab Atkins Jr. via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2025 17:28:23 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
> It's the "weird curve" thing. Which sure isn't great, but I'm not convinced that the alternative is any better. I'm not sure what you're talking about here. In the old version, `random(0, 1)` and `random(per-element --flex--1, 0, 1)` are *the exact opposite*. Your table lists them as alternatives, which is wrong. -- GitHub Notification of comment by tabatkins Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/11742#issuecomment-2711329245 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Monday, 10 March 2025 17:28:24 UTC