- From: Roman Komarov via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2025 09:10:59 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
This is something I thought about, and in the use cases where I tried `progress()`, I always wanted it to be clamped. And wrapping something with `clamp(0, progress(), 1)` was a bit cumbersome. I wonder if we can make this to be controlled by an optional keyword inside `progress()`? Like `progress(clamped, 200px, 0px, 100px)` if it is not clamped by default, or something like `progress(full, 200px, 0px, 100px)` if we decide to clamp by default. Even without default clamping, having a keyword for this common case will be better than manually clamping. Personally, I would prefer to optimize for the more common use cases. But that's not a strong preference. -- GitHub Notification of comment by kizu Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/11825#issuecomment-2705918302 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Friday, 7 March 2025 09:10:59 UTC