- From: Tab Atkins Jr. via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2025 16:57:33 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Yeah, I'm fine with a more explicit name. I would have been okay with making it only expressible via absence, but given #11818 I'd prefer if there was a way to specify it so we can get it without the legacy fallback quirk. I think `unparsed-string` works well. -- GitHub Notification of comment by tabatkins Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/11645#issuecomment-2698335582 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Tuesday, 4 March 2025 16:57:33 UTC