Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-values-4] Should progress() functions clamp to 0-100%? (#11825)

Putting up swatches of bikeshed colors to see how they look in context:

```
progress(unclamped 107px, 0px, 100px);

progress(107px unclamped, 0px, 100px);

progress(open 107px, 0px, 100px);

progress(107px open, 0px, 100px);

progress(continue 107px, 0px, 100px);

progress(107px continue, 0px, 100px);

progress(overflow 107px, 0px, 100px);

progress(107px overflow, 0px, 100px);

progress(cover 107px, 0px, 100px);

progress(107px cover, 0px, 100px);

progress(spread 107px, 0px, 100px);

progress(107px spread, 0px, 100px);

progress(splay 107px, 0px, 100px);

progress(107px splay, 0px, 100px);
```

In a vacuum I agree `unclamped` is a little clunky, and I was thinking about `open` myself. But in context `unclamped` really seems clearest to me.

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by kbabbitt
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/11825#issuecomment-2985681218 using your GitHub account


-- 
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config

Received on Wednesday, 18 June 2025 21:02:53 UTC