- From: Emilio Cobos Álvarez via GitHub <noreply@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2025 11:16:49 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
@frivoal how would you envision this to work if `line-clamp` _and_ `-webkit-line-clamp` are expected both to be shorthands, but none of its longhands are exposed? I don't think that's reasonable. The right interim situation, IMO, is making `line-clamp` a longhand. `-webkit-line-clamp` will be a shorthand for `line-clamp`. When we're ready to expose the different shorthands, we can turn `line-clamp` into a shorthand of those properties. Otherwise the OM is inconsistent, I don't think there's a concept for "shorthand of unspecified longhands", and I'd rather not invent that, since it would effectively be just a longhand. -- GitHub Notification of comment by emilio Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/10439#issuecomment-2983777239 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Wednesday, 18 June 2025 11:16:50 UTC