Re: [csswg-drafts] Inconsistency between `@property { syntax }` (quoted) and `attr(type())` (unquoted) (#12353) from Guillaume via GitHub on 2025-06-18 (public-css-archive@w3.org from June 2025)

From: Guillaume via GitHub <noreply@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2025 08:38:24 +0000
To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-2983245284-1750235901-noreply@w3.org>

Fwiw, if I am not mistaken, the only differences are that `<syntax>` accepts any keyword while `@property/syntax` excludes CSS-wide keywords, and CSS type names are matched case-insensitively in `<syntax>` but case-sensitively in `@property/syntax`, which is probably an oversight (reported [here](https://drafts.css-houdini.org/css-properties-values-api-1/#consume-a-data-type-name)).

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by cdoublev
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/12353#issuecomment-2983245284 using your GitHub account


-- 
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config

Received on Wednesday, 18 June 2025 08:38:25 UTC