- From: Miriam Suzanne via GitHub <noreply@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2025 17:05:59 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
> So maybe it's not needed right now, but it could still affect this discussion since <literal> as <type> isn't going to work: e.g. as as type(as+) is ambiguous. I think we should at the very least plan for something that is unambiguous with basic CSS types like colors. But I'm not sure we need it to be unambiguous with an arbitrary syntax like that? -- GitHub Notification of comment by mirisuzanne Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/12330#issuecomment-2977387895 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Monday, 16 June 2025 17:05:59 UTC