- From: CSS Meeting Bot via GitHub <noreply@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2025 16:59:22 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
The CSS Working Group just discussed ``[css-borders-4] corner-shape `angle` vs `bevel` ``, and agreed to the following: * `RESOLVED: the option will be called bevel` <details><summary>The full IRC log of that discussion</summary> <JoshT> noamr: This is about diagonal line version of corner shape<br> <JoshT> ... in a zero value<br> <JoshT> ... angle and bezel<br> <dholbert> s/bezel/bevel/<br> <JoshT> ... I prefer bevel because it's consistent with canvas<br> <JoshT> ... also, when I think of angle, it makes me think we'll specify an angle like 90deg<br> <JoshT> ... also, I don't have a strong opinion, but it ties up a loose end in the spec<br> <smfr> q+<br> <astearns> ack smfr<br> <iank_> "chamfer" is the correct technical term :)<br> <lea> q+<br> <JoshT> smfr: I feel somewhat strongly that bevel is better<br> <JoshT> ... shaving the corner off something<br> <astearns> ack lea<br> <SebastianZ> q+<br> <JoshT> lea: I feel moderately strongly about angle. better for non-native speakers<br> <fantasai> could also do 'straight', but maybe that's had to spell?<br> <JoshT> ... and corner-shape is used for shapes different to rectangle with corner shaved off, including making diamond shapes<br> <astearns> ack SebastianZ<br> <fantasai> round | straight | notch | scoop<br> <JoshT> SebastianZ: I weakly prefer angle over bevel<br> <fantasai> round | bevel | notch | scoop<br> <fantasai> round | angle | notch | scoop<br> <JoshT> ... but we resolved changing it to angle, maybe through an initiative from Una. but didn't see reasoning behind it<br> <fantasai> round | diagonal | notch | scoop<br> <JoshT> noamr: I want to suggest third option: diagonal<br> <lea> +1 for finding a third option, though no idea what that would be :P<br> <JoshT> ... diagonal corner<br> <smfr> chamfer :)<br> <lea> straight?<br> <smfr> straight was already proposed for "square" so that's confusing<br> <JoshT> astearns: four options. I personally don't like angle. Like what angle?<br> <lea> fair<br> <JoshT> ... diagonal makes it clear it is a diagonal angle<br> <lea> +1 to diagonal<br> <fantasai> POLL: In the context of round | notch | scoop, should we take a) bevel b) diagonal c) angle d) straight e) chamfer<br> <TabAtkins> And in the uncommon case, it's still clearly stretching between the corners of some rectangle, which is also correct<br> <JoshT> ... leaning towards that. maybe because it's a new suggestion<br> <florian> FWIW, I prefer bevel<br> <davidleininger> design tools use bevel right?<br> <JoshT> dholbert: if it's a square, it can mean connecting a line from one corner to the other<br> <kizu> +1 to diagonal, slightly long, but ok-ish<br> <JoshT> TabAtkins: that makes sense. this is connecting two corners of a region<br> <iank_> slant ?<br> <lea> strong -1 to chamfer<br> <fantasai> +1 slant<br> <JoshT> dholbert: it's about two opposite corners<br> <JoshT> noamr: it is the diagonal of the square that defines the corner<br> <lea> slant seems okay too<br> <JoshT> florian: slant is not the worst<br> <TabAtkins> I don't think people would be assuming that about all the other values - using 'round' doesn't mean the entire box is round. It's clearly the shape of the one corner.<br> <SebastianZ> Also strong -1 on chamfer, even when that's used in many 3D tools.<br> <jfkthame> +1 bevel<br> <JoshT> smfr: bevel already exists in canvas<br> <ydaniv> +1<br> <TabAtkins> +1 to bevel, fwiw<br> <dholbert> +1 bevel<br> <kurt> +1 bevel<br> <smfr> `stroke-linejoin="bevel"`<br> <davidleininger> +1 bevel<br> <JoshT> ... so I'm a little surprised how we're not going with what already exists in svg and canvas<br> <JoshT> astearns: poll on bevel vs diagonal?<br> <fantasai> POLL: In the context of round | notch | scoop, should we take a) bevel b) diagonal c) angle d) straight e) chamfer f) slant<br> <JoshT> ... any other options?<br> <emeyer> A<br> <davidleininger> A<br> <dholbert> a<br> <miriam> a<br> <schenney> a<br> <noamr> a<br> <jfkthame> a<br> <futhark> a<br> <florian> a<br> <JoshT> a<br> <SebastianZ> c<br> <smfr> a<br> <iank_> A<br> <ydaniv> a<br> <kbabbitt> a<br> <fantasai> a, b/d/f<br> <astearns> a<br> <castastrophe> A<br> <TabAtkins> a<br> <kurt> a<br> <oriol> a<br> <kizu> a<br> <lea> b, c, d, f<br> <JoshT> astearn: clear winner of bevel, shall we resolve?<br> <JoshT> RESOLVED: the option will be called bevel<br> </details> -- GitHub Notification of comment by css-meeting-bot Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/12232#issuecomment-2963551270 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Wednesday, 11 June 2025 16:59:23 UTC