- From: Lea Verou via GitHub <noreply@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2025 04:02:34 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
One thing to note is that "contour", while more accurate, is a word that is less friendly to non native speakers compared to "shape". More substantively: - I like the core idea, I think it makes a lot of sense. There are also a lot of use cases around variable strokes along a path, I wonder if it can cover them (not necessarily now). - It seems the two paths case is basically a Porter-Duff operator and should ideally be handled by a new shape function that takes `<shape>` args? `compound()`? - I'm finding the second and third examples pretty hard to read TBH (but perhaps the complexity is inherent in the use cases) -- GitHub Notification of comment by LeaVerou Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/11679#issuecomment-2948013873 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Friday, 6 June 2025 04:02:35 UTC