Re: [csswg-drafts] Republishing Tasks Permathread (#6900)

The CSS Working Group just discussed `FPWD of css-shapes-2 or porting shape() to css-shapes-1`, and agreed to the following:

* `RESOLVED: Move shape() to css-shapes-1 and ask for wide review on that and maybe path() and add noamr as editor to css-shapes-1`

<details><summary>The full IRC log of that discussion</summary>
&lt;fantasai> Topic: FPWD of css-shapes-2 or porting shape() to css-shapes-1<br>
&lt;fantasai> github: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6900#issuecomment-2930919526<br>
&lt;fantasai> noamr: Time for a WD that includes the shape() function<br>
&lt;fantasai> noamr: There are other things in shapes-2 that are not ready for WD, so proposal is to move shape() to css-shapes-1 and publish a WD of that<br>
&lt;kbabbitt> scribe+ kbabbitt<br>
&lt;fantasai> noamr: Then it can live happily with the rest of the basic shapes<br>
&lt;kbabbitt> fantasai: seems reasonable<br>
&lt;kbabbitt> ... shapes 1 is currently CR<br>
&lt;kbabbitt> ... by moving it in maybe it will get published<br>
&lt;kbabbitt> ... probably want to publish WD in ?? review<br>
&lt;kbabbitt> ... try to move it back into CR<br>
&lt;fantasai> ChrisL: want to drop from CR?<br>
&lt;fantasai> fantasai: adding new feature, seems appropriate<br>
&lt;fantasai> astearns: Didn't drop for path()<br>
&lt;fantasai> astearns: but either way is fine by me<br>
&lt;fantasai> ChrisL: dropping the whole draft to WD is a signal we don't want to send, but it is a new feature<br>
&lt;fantasai> astearns: can we put the feature in and ask for wide review just the new feature?<br>
&lt;fantasai> ChrisL: would be fine<br>
&lt;kbabbitt> fantasai: I think we can do that<br>
&lt;fantasai> astearns: Move shape() to css-shapes-1 and when ready ask for wide review on that and maybe path()<br>
&lt;fantasai> astearns: any objections?<br>
&lt;fantasai> RESOLVED: Move shape() to css-shapes-1 and ask for wide review on that and maybe path() and add noamr as editor to css-shapes-1<br>
</details>


-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by css-meeting-bot
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6900#issuecomment-2940604795 using your GitHub account


-- 
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config

Received on Wednesday, 4 June 2025 16:09:00 UTC