- From: Callum Law via GitHub <noreply@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2025 06:33:09 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Thanks for pointing that out, the wording there is a bit ambiguous in my opinion, perhaps it should be reworded to: > If any property that maps to shorthand is not present in longhands, continue with the steps labeled shorthand loop. Happy to do the PR on my end if you agree that's appropriate. -- GitHub Notification of comment by Calme1709 Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/12262#issuecomment-2933713601 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Tuesday, 3 June 2025 06:33:10 UTC