- From: Kevin Babbitt via GitHub <noreply@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2025 15:25:07 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Thanks @oSamDavis. A couple of observations: - In cases where there are no repeaters, it should always be possible to line the lists up via LCM - Integer repeaters can always be expanded to equivalent non-repeater lists Given those two observations, I think it is in fact possible to produce a shorthand for case 3, though it would require expanding the lists out to 36 values each. So a naive algorithm for serialization might be to first expand all integer repeaters; then if there are no unaligned auto repeaters, serialize using LCM. But that might go against author expectations in simple cases. For example, if I specify: ```css column-rule: repeat(5, thin solid black, thick solid gray); ``` That decomposes into: ```css column-rule-width: repeat(5, thin thick); column-rule-style: repeat(5, solid solid); column-rule-color: repeat(5, black gray); ``` And I might expect serialization of the shorthand to recompose to what was originally specified. Or maybe that would be too magical? I think we need to figure out the right tradeoffs between implementation complexity and preserving what was originally specified. Agenda+ to take the WG's temperature on this. -- GitHub Notification of comment by kbabbitt Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/12201#issuecomment-3133028372 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Tuesday, 29 July 2025 15:25:08 UTC