Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-images-4] Add `light-dark-image()`, or generalize `light-dark()` for images too? (#12513) from Sebastian Zartner via GitHub on 2025-07-23 (public-css-archive@w3.org from July 2025)

From: Sebastian Zartner via GitHub <noreply@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2025 11:57:27 +0000
To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-3107532554-1753271845-noreply@w3.org>

> And if we go down that route, I wonder if we can just make the type a parameter, since there's precedent for that…

I wonder if we actually need that. Depending on the given parameters and context in which the function is used its return type should be clear. And if there are cases, in which the function would be ambiguous, that would be candidate for explicit type conversion as discussed in #6408.

Sebastian

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by SebastianZ
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/12513#issuecomment-3107532554 using your GitHub account


-- 
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config

Received on Wednesday, 23 July 2025 11:57:28 UTC