- From: Chris Lilley via GitHub <noreply@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2025 14:26:23 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
@vlevantovsky would CSS Fonts 4 benefit from review by SC 29 (for consistency with [14496-22 Part 22: Open font format](https://www.iso.org/standard/87621.html?browse=tc)) or is that not in scope/not needed? -- GitHub Notification of comment by svgeesus Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4944#issuecomment-3089663720 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Friday, 18 July 2025 14:26:24 UTC