- From: CSS Meeting Bot via GitHub <noreply@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2025 16:46:03 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
The CSS Working Group just discussed `[css-view-transitions-2] Elements with content-visibility in new Document`, and agreed to the following: * `RESOLVED: compute missing content-visibility information as we iterate the tree while capturing` <details><summary>The full IRC log of that discussion</summary> <kbabbitt> noamr: this is a lifecycle issue with view transitions<br> <kbabbitt> ... don't capture v-t if it's not relevant to user<br> <kbabbitt> ... away from viewport, content-visibility auto<br> <kbabbitt> .... issue with cross document v-t<br> <kbabbitt> ... might not know yet if an element is close to viewport or not<br> <kbabbitt> ... also if element were added between starting v-t and activating it<br> <kbabbitt> ... original idea was to play around with order in rendering lifecycle but that caused issues<br> <kbabbitt> ... proposal on issue now is that when we go through the tree of elements to see what needs to be captured<br> <kbabbitt> ... if we didn't compute content-visibility for an element, then we do<br> <kbabbitt> ... v-t algo iterates over all elements anyway<br> <kbabbitt> ... to find capture<br> <kbabbitt> ... so if it finds an element that's new and we don't know if it's captured<br> <kbabbitt> ... compute what we need for it at that point<br> <kbabbitt> noamr: wouldn't change behavior in chromium, would probably fix a bug in firefox<br> <kbabbitt> Rossen9: any feedback?<br> <kbabbitt> Rossen9: all for fixing bugs, not hearing anyone from gecko side express concerns<br> <kbabbitt> noamr: Proposed: compute missing content-visibility information as we iterate the tree while capturing<br> <kbabbitt> Rossen9: objections?<br> <kbabbitt> RESOLVED: compute missing content-visibility information as we iterate the tree while capturing<br> </details> -- GitHub Notification of comment by css-meeting-bot Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/10773#issuecomment-3079426767 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Wednesday, 16 July 2025 16:46:04 UTC