Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-conditional] Nested at-rules within at-rule() (#11117)

Yeah, I think allowing both the simple "just the name" and the full-parsing "the entire rule" possibilities is probably the way to go. The latter is verbose, but for most at-rules you can leave out quite a lot and still get something valid. It also neatly answers *any other* structural questions we might have about testing and relationships between at-rules.

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by tabatkins
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/11117#issuecomment-3075958620 using your GitHub account


-- 
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config

Received on Tuesday, 15 July 2025 22:36:57 UTC