Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-animations] How should relative-length values be interpreted when used in the <keyframe-selector> production in the @keyframes prelude? (#10880)

The CSS Working Group just discussed `[css-animations] How should relative-length values be interpreted when used in the <keyframe-selector> production in the @keyframes prelude?`, and agreed to the following:

* `RESOLVED: Relative units resolve against the animation target`

<details><summary>The full IRC log of that discussion</summary>
&lt;emilio> bramus: so if you use 10em in your keyframes, what does it resolve to?<br>
&lt;emilio> ... suggestion is relative to the element that the animation targets<br>
&lt;emilio> astearns: consistent with `var()`<br>
&lt;bramus> emilio: seems fine<br>
&lt;emilio> PROPOSED: Relative units resolve against the element the animation targets<br>
&lt;emilio> emilio: or pseudo I guess<br>
&lt;ntim> i'm concerned that no one is concerned :)<br>
&lt;emilio> RESOLVED: Relative units resolve against the animation target<br>
</details>


-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by css-meeting-bot
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/10880#issuecomment-2628572931 using your GitHub account


-- 
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config

Received on Friday, 31 January 2025 23:39:50 UTC