- From: CSS Meeting Bot via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2025 21:42:37 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
The CSS Working Group just discussed `[css-gaps-1] Computed value of row-rule-width when row-rule-style is none or hidden`, and agreed to the following: * `RESOLVED: don't apply the hidden/none quirk to row-rule, for reasons in #11494` <details><summary>The full IRC log of that discussion</summary> <TabAtkins> kbabbitt: similar question to previous<br> <TabAtkins> kbabbitt: do we want to carry the back-compat beahvior over to the new row-rule-* properties<br> <TabAtkins> kbabbitt: guessing the answer is no<br> <TabAtkins> kbabbitt: seems we're leaning toward preserving the author-exposed value, with minimal back-compat<br> <TabAtkins> kbabbitt: so we don't apply to the row props<br> <TabAtkins> astearns: so proposed is "don't apply the hidden/none quirk to row-rule, for reasons in 11494"<br> <TabAtkins> RESOLVED: don't apply the hidden/none quirk to row-rule, for reasons in #11494<br> </details> -- GitHub Notification of comment by css-meeting-bot Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/11493#issuecomment-2628449171 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Friday, 31 January 2025 21:42:38 UTC