- From: Mayank via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2025 18:16:30 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
I hate to re-tread older ground, but looking at past discussions, [option 3](https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6323#issuecomment-2207341923) was never fully rejected. The tradeoffs of options 2 and 3 were discussed, but no resolution. Option 3 would look something like `@layer ^top.overrides`, where `^top` is a UA-reserved strong layer name, and `overrides` is an author-defined sub-layer name. Benefits: - More explicit, addressing the concerns re: "Any symbol will be less explicit than an explicit description." - Clear namespace separation, so that `@layer overrides` does not conflict with `@layer ^top.overrides`. It was said earlier that option 2 and option 3 are the same (which would make this bikeshed), but in my mind, the namespace separation is an important distinction. -- GitHub Notification of comment by mayank99 Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6323#issuecomment-2628021273 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Friday, 31 January 2025 18:16:31 UTC