- From: CSS Meeting Bot via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2025 23:51:31 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
The CSS Working Group just discussed `[css-overflow] Should overflow-clip-margin allow negative lengths?`, and agreed to the following: * `RESOLVED: allow negative lengths in overflow-clip-margin, with the obvious effect` <details><summary>The full IRC log of that discussion</summary> <TabAtkins> emilio: this came about when we were discussing whether o-c-m shoudl apply to scrollable boxes<br> <TabAtkins> emilio: we ahve values that let you shrink the clip region<br> <TabAtkins> emilio: so is there a godo reason to not allow negative lengths?<br> <emilio> TabAtkins: we designed it to allow expanding the region<br> <emilio> ... wasn't obvious that we needed to make it smaller<br> <emilio> ... but you're right that the box values allow it to get smaller<br> <florian> +1<br> <emilio> ... so may as well<br> <kizu> +1<br> <TabAtkins> astearns: so proposed resolution is to allow negative lengths in overflow-clip-margin<br> <TabAtkins> astearns: objections?<br> <TabAtkins> RESOLVED: allow negative lengths in overflow-clip-margin, with the obvious effect<br> <TabAtkins> florian: should we talk about 10745 (applying to scrollable?)<br> <TabAtkins> emilio: i tabled that part earlier<br> </details> -- GitHub Notification of comment by css-meeting-bot Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/11355#issuecomment-2625959704 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Thursday, 30 January 2025 23:51:31 UTC